Änderungen
Aus SchopfungsWiki
→Young Earth Creationism: Translation
==Young Earth CreationismJunge-Erde-Kreationismus==In the current science community environmentder aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Szene, which embraces the evolutionary positiondie der evolutionistischen Position folgt, könnte [[young earth creationismJunge-Erde-Kreationismus]] could be seen as Bible scientific foreknowledgeals biblisches Vorwissen betrachtet werden. Young earth creationist scientists have a number of compelling arguments for young earth creationismKreationisten haben eine große Anzahl überzeugender Hinweise für eine junge Erde,<ref name=qa>"[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp Get Answers]." Answers in Genesis, n.d. Accessed September 13, 2008.</ref><ref name=trueorigin>[http://www.trueorigin.org/ The True.Origin Archive]." Accessed September 13, 2008.</ref><ref name=Brown>Brown, Walt. ''[http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for the Creation and the Flood].'' Center for Scientific Creation, 2008. Accessed September 13, 2008.</ref> as well as having a number of compelling arguments against the evolutionary viewssowie viele Argumente gegen die evolutionistische Sichtweise. One needs to go no further than the Mehr als 600 Ph.D Wissenschaftler äußerten ihre Skeptik ([http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/ ''Dissent From Darwin''] list of over 600 Ph.D scientists stating skepticism over ) darüber, dass "random mutations and selectionzufällige Mutationen und natürliche Selektion" being responsible for the biological changes required for ausreichen um die notwendigen biologischen Veränderungen für [[evolutionEvolution]]herbeizuführen.
In the field of der [[astronomyAstronomie]]können viele Beispiele in der wissenschaftlichen Literatur gefunden werden, one can find many examples from scientific literature indicating that the current naturalistic explanations for the planetsdie darauf hindeuten, solar systemsdass aktuelle naturalistische Erklärungen für Planeten, starsSonnensysteme, and universe have failedSterne, und das Universum fehlschlugen. (SeeVergleiche: [[Astronomy quotesAstronomie Zitate]]). The Die [[big bangBig Bang Theorie]] theory has several beinhaltet mehrere massive errors in itFehler. One involves antimatter and the need for more of it Einer davon betrifft Antimaterie und die Notwendigkeit für mehr davon in our universeunserem Universum. Defenders of this model are not addressing it and are offering yet more speculationVerteidiger des Big Bang geben darauf keine Antwort oder bringen nur weitere Spekulation hervor. The award-winning essay, Der ausgezeichnete Artikel [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2006/contest-winner/lamicela.pdf ''Antimatter and the Big Bang''], from Answers von Antworten in Genesis, discusses this flaw in greater detaildiskutiert dies im Detail. In the field of [[geology]], [[catastrophism]], which young earth creationists have always affirmed, is now recognized as being a normal part of earth's history and is supported by leading scientists in the field such as [http://www.globalflood.org/ Dr. John Baumgardner].<ref name=RothA>Roth, Ariel A. "[http://www.grisda.org/georpts/gr11.htm Catastrophism: Is It Scientific]?" ''Geoscience Reports'' Spring 1990 No. 11. Accessed September 13, 2008.</ref> In [[anthropology]], the evolutionary position offers a poor quality of evidence; reasonable science measures the antiquity of man on a young earth time scale.<ref name=anthro>"[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/Anthropology.asp Get Answers: Anthropology]." Answers in Genesis, n.d. Accessed September 13, 2008.</ref><ref name=Bass2>Bass, Alden. "[http://www.apologeticspress.com/articles/2313 'Reasonable Science' and the Antiquity of Man]." Apologetics Press. Accessed September 13, 2008.</ref> In addition, the fossil record speaks loudly for creationism with stasis and sudden appearances and disappearances of organisms. In fact some invertebrates were more complex and if anything have shown to be devolving from older forms of the same organism.<ref name=fossils>"[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/fossils.asp Get Answers: Fossils]." Answers in Genesis, n.d. Accessed September 13, 2008.</ref> Even the evolutionist Mark Ridley stated in the science journal ''New Scientist'':{{cquote|In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favour of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation.<ref name=Ridley>Mark Ridley, ''Who doubts evolution?'', ''New Scientist'', vol. 90, 25 June 1981, p. 831</ref>}}
==Dinosaurs==